Here is a story with links from Sydney Bacchus to the Palm Beach Post regarding a recent news story about the mine pits that are costing taxpayers over $200 million.
Date: 3/30/2008 3:37:55 PM To: Palm Beach Post Cc: Robert King; Frank Cerabino; Sally Swartz; Antigone Barton Subject: unsupported claims for mine pits
March 30, 2008
Attention: Editors Letters to the Editor Palm Beach Post P.O. Box 24700 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4700
Dear Editors,
I was dismayed by the misuse of terms in Robert King¹s March 27th article (below) on the Palm Beach rock pits. He did a commendable job dismissing the mining industry¹s efforts to portray mined pits as ³lakes.² Unfortunately his article incorrectly references the ³six deep pits near Loxahatchee², set for purchase by the SFWMD for $213.9 million, as ³reservoirs² that will provide water ³storage.²
Although the mining industry and SFWMD use these terms to describe mine pits, in my opinion the Post¹s perpetuation of these misnomers is a grave disservice to the unsuspecting public. The SFWMD attempts to justify spending more than $200 million of Florida residents¹ hard-earned tax dollars on these mine pits as something positive that will conserve water and even ³restore² the Everglades.
I have not seen a single scientific study to confirm such incredible claims. In fact, I have made multiple requests for Palm Beach County provide a copy of even a statement by a licensed professional asserting that water is not flowing freely into and out of the mine pits referenced as ³storage.² The active dewatering of such pits and the aquifer supporting the Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge and Everglades via evaporative water loss already has been documented in a USGS publication.
Until the County or SFWMD produce results of a scientific study proving these pits fulfill SFWMD claims, I urge you to reassign coverage of mine pits touted as ³storage,² ³reservoirs² or ³restoration² to Frank Cerabino. He is far more adept at reporting farcical stories than Robert King. At least the taxpayers will get some humor for their $200+ million expenditure by SFWMD.
Sydney Bacchus, Ph. D. Hydroecologist Athens, GA 30603 _________________ http://www.palmbeachpost.com/localnews/content/local_news/epaper/2008/03/27/ s8b_rockpits_0327.html
2.7-foot dispute could cost rock-pit firm $1.5 million
By ROBERT P. KING
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
Thursday, March 27, 2008
Water managers are withholding a final $6 million payment to Palm Beach Aggregates until they resolve a 2.7-foot discrepancy about the depth of a reservoir the mining company created for the Everglades restoration.
The South Florida Water Management District called it a minor snag in its 2003 deal with the company. Water managers have put $213.9 million into a court-controlled bank account to pay Aggregates for its work, saying the company has delivered the 15 billion gallons of storage it promised in six deep pits near Loxahatchee.
The impasse centers on how much extra storage Aggregates created beyond the minimum required. That will mean a month's delay in the final payment, district land-acquisition director Ruth Clements said Wednesday.
The discrepancy centers on the depth of one pit. The company's and district's estimates differ by 2.7 feet, or about 100 million gallons.
"We are going to wait 30 days, go out and resurvey," Clements said. Stirred-up sediment may have skewed surveyors' results, he said. The final answer will decide whether the payment is $6 million or $4.5 million.
Regardless, the company must leave $15 million in the account until the district verifies that the pits hold water.
The district calls the reservoir project a success, but it turned controversial after former Palm Beach County Commissioners Tony Masilotti and Warren Newell were jailed in corruption cases that arose partly from deals involving the company. Aggregates executives were never charged and have said they did nothing wrong.
|
Return to compendium of resources and issues
This resource focuses on adverse impacts from mining currently not addressed or evaluated by regulatory agencies and municipalities, as well as alternatives to mining and approaches for improved monitoring and evaluation of existing and proposed mine sites and mine-related impacts. This portal is made possible thanks to the volunteer efforts of scientists, other professionals and citizens.
© Demers & Meers (2006). All
rights reserved.
Do not reproduce without permission.
Last updated May 17, 2008
|